Showing posts with label great mysteries of life. Show all posts
Showing posts with label great mysteries of life. Show all posts

Saturday, November 22, 2008

polo zoology

Weird Al Yankovic is not someone I ever thought would inspire me to deeper thought. Make me laugh, yes. Send me into a frenzy of research not assigned by a professor? Most definitely not. But, I must concede, his poetic ballad "Buy Me A Condo", has raised a burning philosophical question for me. The lyric "I gonna get me da T-shirt wit' de alligator on" really sparked my interest in an aspect of the prepster lifestyle often gone unnoticed: Why are the preps obsessed with tiny animal emblems on their clothing? Lacoste has the alligator, Brooks Brothers the sheep, and Vineyard Vines the pink whale (along with the rest of the animal kingdom in fantastic colors). Is it some sort of secret society symbol? WASPs and PETA unite?
Being from southern California, I really thought I'd encountered every stereotype you could possibly imagine right outside my door (and a couple inside the door as well). Surfers, hippies, yuppies, soccer moms, gangsters, Hollywood insiders, Hollywood outsiders, hipsters, scenesters....But it was only when I came to GW that I realized the notable absence in my hometown: the prep. There are no boat shoes, no pink polos, no summers at the shore or winters at the lodge in the City of Angels. For those of you from L.A., picture a regatta passing the Venice Beach drum circle, rasta men cheering them on as they float down the hepatitis-infested L.A. river. Imagine trying to wear a cable knit sweater on a 65 degree Christmas Day, or a set of pearls with your wetsuit in April.
So I'm not a scholar of the WASP traditions, but I'm a keen observer of their practices here in the borderline south, and while the culture as a whole puzzles and intrigues me, this zoo of animal logos is one that seems to have no consistency, no root in their monogrammed past. So I did a little digging, and have constructed the Non-Prep's Guide to Polo Zoology, for all those as fascinated with the WASPs as I am.
Brooks Brothers had the first animal logo in the prep kingdom, and (not surprisingly) the one that makes the most sense. The "golden fleece" or "magical flying ram" had long been a trademark of the British wool merchants, who jacked it from Greek mythology. Brooks Brothers stuck it on the tag of every blazer, and thus begins the textile domestication of animals.
But, as we can glean from history (and fashion) the seasons change, and as they do, animals emerge from hibernation and migrate out into the open. Animal insignia migration patters suggest that at this point in history, they moved from their hidden lair on the tag, to a place prominently stitched over every prep’s heart. The first to make its way there was the alligator.
Rene Lacoste, nicknamed "The Alligator" after losing a tennis match and an alligator suitcase along with it, invented the polo in 1933. Tennis-garb was generally hot and uncomfortable, and Lacoste developed a light, loose-fitting shirt that maintained an air of class while on the court, and decided to trademark the shirts with his own alligator symbol. While there seems to be an internal debate at Lacoste whether it is a crocodile or alligator, the little green guy has appeared on the polo ever since as the first example of prominent label display.
Twenty-two years later, Minneapolis-based Munsingwear (an underwear and military supply company) introduced a similar design, called the "golf shirt" to the American public, through a line called "Original Penguin". Their excuse for having an Arctic creature as their mascot is rather morbid: a Munsingwear salesman saw a flock of penguins in a taxidermist's window, and bought one on a whim, taking it back to the office with him and affectionately naming the stuffed thing "Pete". Everyone took such a liking to the animated little guy, they glorified him on every golf shirt in America.
Next up we have Mr. Ralph Lauren. After leaving Brooks Brothers, he realized that in order to successfully make a mark in the prep fashion collection, he needed one thing and one thing only: his very own animal. But without a tradition, a nickname, or a cute story, Mr. Lauren was at a loss. However, with his astute marketing sense, and a love for homonyms, Ralph decided to take the easy route: put polo on the polo. And so it came to pass, the tiny polo player and his horse to sit upon our shirts. Let’s ignore the fact that polo players only started wearing polos after a few years of envying the comfortable tennis clothes (although I’d argue that polo isn’t going to be a comfortable sport, clothed or otherwise). We’ll dismiss the notion that he has violated what seems to be an "animals only" rule in the prep logo world by putting a player upon the horse. All those blatant offenses aside, he succeeded in creating the most recognized fellow with a mallet that could ever appear on your chest.
At this point, over population and mutation fostered deviation from the standard animal/prep kingdom. Vineyard Vines, a popular Nantucket-based clothier, appropriately chose a whale for its mascot….and turned it pink. J. Crew, not being able to commit to one creature, decided to let the zoo loose on everything, stitching pants with ducks and dogs, crabs and lobsters, trout and foxes. Some mutants branched off and devolved, birthing the unwanted step-children of the prep collection, Abercrombie & Fitch and American Eagle.
While I have yet to discover the greater answer to why exactly they chose animals and not hieroglyphics, my study of the WASP tribe will continue in earnest. Now educated in polo zoology, all I need is a Cuisinart and some wall-to-wall carpeting, and Weird Al and I can stir gin in the bath and quibble over which yacht to take to the vineyard, with our trusty alligators over our hearts.

Monday, November 3, 2008

the death of class and other weekend musings

Halloween might be the personification of the death of class, especially on a college campus. I was walking in my golden track shorts and Dancing Elk Condors tee (for those of you who missed the reference (or the movie altogether), Michael Cera from Juno), and a baseball team passed by me. I'm not sure what league they play for, but if you tried to slide into home plate with the booty shorts and heels these girls had on, I'm pretty sure you'd rip off your first four layers of skin, break your ankle, and flash the catcher. I was under the impression Halloween was when the spirits come to play, not the strippers. I'm unclear on when "dressing up" became "barely dressing". Someone enlighten me?
While it's most apparent on Halloween, I find culturally this generation is somewhat devoid of class. I was up in New York a few weekends ago with my mom, her boyfriend Chris, and my cousin Emily at an absolutely beautiful penthouse apartment 25 stories above Times Square. I felt almost wrong being in that apartment, like a stain on a white linen couch. I dressed nice just to sit around eating pita chips, French chocolates, and drinking champagne, and felt guilty about anything remotely unclassy I'd done in my life. That whole weekend felt like a very classy movie: a horse show in New Jersey, tapas on the Lower East Side, martinis in Hell's Kitchen, a glass and silver penthouse, museums to see original Babar drawings. Forgive me for being theatrical, but I want my life to be like that all the time. At tapas, over crab artichoke dip and vodka citrons, Chris asked Emily and I what we did with our friends when we went out. Answers included Bars, hanging out in people's rooms, live music, talk...
"Dancing?" Chris asked.
"You mean nearly getting impregnated and in danger of having 7 different STDS by the time you leave the club? Cuz that's what dancing is now."
Now I know we're not the first generation to walk on the raunchy side; the jitterbug and jazz music were considered low-class, risque, even dangerous in their day. But going to a club now is like asking to get mock-raped. So is that going to one day be considered classy? And if so, what will be considered sleazy? It's an upsetting future to think about. I would love to go back to the days where men wore slacks and button-ups, girls wore dresses and heels, and it wasn't considered pretentious to sit around listening to jazz. When guys held open doors, and going out dancing meant getting dressed in your best and having a partner who's face you actually saw once in a while. I am by no means a traditionalist, nor is this a comment on social ettiquite between men and women. I just think there's something to be said for carrying yourself with dignity.
I'm not saying we need to be pretentious-I felt classy sitting in a Cheers-esque bar with Emily, eating nachos and downing Yuengling. It's not as much a matter of what you're doing, it's the way in which you do it.

And now for something completely different....

Weekends in college are usually underwhelming (10 Things anyone?), or at least mine are. But what I find interesting is that the good moments are never where I think they'll be. I went to two parties this weekend, both were costume parties with people I love, and were expected to be the highlights of my three precious days off.
Despite one party being rave-themed and thus lending itself to being a highlight, it didn't come until this afternoon, six minutes away from the end of the radio show I'm on at GW, Vibrations of Nations. In the control room, there are these office chairs. None of them are intact. They're missing arms, parts of the cushions are ripped out, they have no restraint on how far back they lean...naturally, this makes for endless entertainment. Wyatt and I tend to rock out when we've got a good playlist going, and he played a song this week, Sandcastle Disco by Solange, that lent itself to just that. It is the best dance song ever.
Especially when your partner is a broken office chair.
It was a movie moment. Again, forgive the theatrics, but two college djs rocking out to funk with their broken office chairs?
That's part of what I love about being on the radio. While I get to share my passion with as many people as will listen to the show, I don't have to actually perform or be "on" for anyone. Sure, you can watch us be ridiculous via the webcam, but I can't see you. And yet I get a response as if I were in front of a crowd. Listeners IM me throughout the show, complimenting the playlist, giving me great tidbits about the bands I can then share with everyone on the air, or introducing me to new artists I might like, and will probably play in the coming weeks. It's put me in touch with people I don't necessarily talk to, and people I look up to are complimenting me on my work. Plus, I can come in there a complete mess, but the rhythm of pushing all the buttons, logging the show, chatting with Wyatt and everyone who's listening, I feel completely calm when I leave.
It's a good place to be-I'm doing my own thing, while still connected to everyone, still contributing something to life on this planet.
Speaking of which, I've gotten a lot of requests for the playlists from the show. Here's what we played this afternoon (in the order we played them, and going title, artist, album):

1. Mafia feat. Eugene Hutz- Acquaragia Drom- Rom Kaffe
2. Either/Or-Elliott Smith-New Moon
3. Heckuva Man- The Sweet Divines- Soulshaker Vol. 5
4. Thank You Mario But Our Princess is in Another Castle-The Mountain Goats-Black Pear EP (free online!)
5. Pepper Box- The Peppers- Pepper Box
6. Fake Tales of San Francisco-The Arctic Monkeys-Whatever People Say I Am, That's What I'm Not
7. Deep Blue Sea- Grizzly Bear- Friend
8. I Believe in You-Cat Power-Jukebox
9. Lie Next To Me- The Blakes- The Blakes
10. Shopping Trolley-Beth Orton-Comfort of Strangers
11. Evil Bee- Menomena- Friend & Foe
12. Love You Madly-Cake-Comfort Eagle
13. Salty Dog- Cat Power- The Covers Record
14. Taper Jean Girl-Kings of Leon-Aha Shake Heartbreak
15. Hang Ups feat. Abdominal- Speech Defect- Come for da Funeral, Stay for da Food
16. She's Fantastic-Sondre Lerche-Phantom Punch
17. No Man Worries- Speedometer (feat. Ria Currie)- Four Flights Up
18. Heretics-Andrew Bird-Armchair Apocrypha
19. Guerreiro- Curumin- Achados e Perdidos
20. Cigarettes Will Kill You-Ben Lee-Single
21. Multiply- Jamie Lidell- Multiply
22. See Fernando-Jenny Lewis-Acid Tongue
23. Eanie Meanie- Jim Noir- Tower of Love
24. The King of Carrot Flowers Pt. 1-Neutral Milk Hotel-In an Aeroplane Over the Sea
25. See You At The Lights- 1990s- Cookies
26. Cristobal-Devendra Banhart-Smokey Rolls Down Thunder Canyon
27. Sandcastle Disco- Solange- Sol-Angel & The Hadley St. Dreams
28. Ses Monuments-Sea Wolf-Get to the River Before It Runs Too Low
29. Hey-Pixies-Doolittle
30. Phantom Punch- Sondre Lerche & The Faces Down
31. Electro-Socket Blues-Rogue Wave-Nick and Norah's Infinite Playlist Original Soundtrack

Enjoy :)

Saturday, October 25, 2008

bewitched, bothered, and bewildered

Today's Case: Can Eb actually control the universe with her thoughts? Evidence provided within the last week has raised questions, and thus we put it to a jury of her peers to judge whether or not she's got telepathy with the world.

Take these four scenarios:

Evidence A:
I was walking across the street in the middle of the night, stressing about what all those guys in three piece suits on Wall Street are worrying about right now: money...and more specifically, how I don't have any of it. Just as I am contemplating setting up nice box in the Lincoln Memorial and eating Kraft Mac and Cheese for eternity, a guy drives by in a black Porsche, roaring up 24th Street, and throws something out the window.
$20.00.
Granted, it was rolled up and dusted with a lovely white substance, but it was $20.00 all the same.

Evidence B:
Inspired by the fantastic film "That Thing You Do", I asked a friend of mine the last time they were really kissed. Not an "Oh hey my tongue is in your mouth and it kinda tastes like beer" kiss, but really kissed by someone. We determined it'd been quite too long for both of us, and that we didn't necessarily want Prince Charming, we just wanted to be reminded what a good kiss feels like.
Judging by the standing evidence, I'll the jury conclude that story for themselves.

Evidence C:
Lucky me got to interview Ben Kweller for WRGW last week. Turns out we have something in common: we both get intense nosebleeds at the most inopporutne moments, shedding amounts of blood that would make that whole sacraficial cutting of oneself for a divine blood offering in the Aztec culture completely painless, not to mention we'd be exceedingly popular with the deities.
Three minutes later, it looks like a murder scene in the station as my nose starts pouring blood.

Evidence D:
I have a class with a guy I used to date, and every day on the way, I pass his building. Last week I thought to myself, "Weird how I walk by his building to a class we have at the same time in the same place and I never run into him. Watch, now he's gonna walk out the door just cuz I said that."
Ask and ye shall receive.

Based on current evidence, I ask the jury to reach a verdict: Can Eb actually control the universe with her thoughts? She has now been asked on numerous occasions for unicorns, boyfriends, A papers, and a cookie. Unfortunately, it seems as though this power does not take requests. So is it something that links money, kisses, nosebleeds, and ex-boyfriends?

Has the jury reached a verdict?

Thursday, October 23, 2008

I love you. Let's light ourselves on fire.

For the past week, I've been feeling a little lame about starting a blog. My friends Leah and Diego have funny, witty, endlessly entertaining and creative blogs to which I hold no candle, and I thought to myself, "What business do you have starting a blog? If you become one of those people all your journalism professors bash for being an 'uninformed informant', I will kill you." Plus, I had nothing to say and no one to read it. Which I hear are both essential components to the whole blogging deal.
Yet here I am, on the blogging bandwagon. How? Well, I was told. I was actually told "write this down!" today after a conversation that turned heads in the middle of 22nd Street. What better to write about than something somebody has already told you they're interested in hearing?
So here I am, honoring the wishes of a friend. A real friend.
And that's where this starts.
It starts with my definition of friend.

I find most misunderstandings, broken hearts, screams and shouts, tears, all start with two people who have fundamentally different definitions of whatever the concept at hand is. We fight in circles about what is "right" and what is "wrong", when really it's just how I see it versus how you see it. We both consider ourselves right, with no real intention of admitting to be anything but. So that's the foundation we're working with. Already, there's a disconnect. In the end, we decide either that the relationship is more important than getting our way, or not. But the definition gap remains.

My definition of friend is narrow. I know and like a lot of people. I do not have a lot of friends, and I don't think it's natural to, not by my definition. A true friend, a real friend, is someone I have given a part of myself to. "Take this. Don't break it." And, the most important part of the definition, is that the other person has given me a piece of themselves to me with the same openness, but also the same warning, attached. Cliche, I know, but sometimes you have to re-coin a cliche for yourself before you understand why it's a cliche. Anyways, that takes all the energy I've got on any given day, or in any given time in my life. So I've usually got one of these friends at a time. One true close friend. I guess the term "best" applies here. And I don't think any of the other people I know would be offended to hear that, or that they couldn't point out that person in their own lives at some point.

So I embark on this kind of friendship (my definition applied) with someone. We get close. Really close. And then I start to get nervous, because I can feel it, I can feel them slipping. It's like a curse-it's happened to me so many times, I can feel when someone is losing interest. Either we've been separated physically or, more often than not, they meet someone else. In my specific case, my best friends have been guys, and they usually meet a girl who will talk hockey and sleep with them, so I rapidly become about as obsolete as a first generation iPod. Sometimes I even warn the person it's going to happen, but so infatuated and wrapped up with being so close to another human being, they reach such an extreme high that they say they cannot possibly imagine ever betraying the trust and finding the relationship boring once I've spilled my guts.
And that's exactly what happens. Every time. Without fail.
Here's where I find my disconnect with the rest of the human population (it seems) kicks me in the ass. When I get to this point with someone, I give. A lot. My friend Wyatt used an extremely nerdy but absolutely perfect analogy: friendships are like venn diagrams. You give parts of yourself and your friends give parts of themselves, until you're inextricably connected. They don't work if both people don't give. You need to give. Either you need to start trusting the other person, or get out.
Getting out should never be frowned upon at this point in the friendship. If you can't commit, just go. The last thing anyone wants is to be lead on a leash past the point of no return and then left hanging off the cliff as they wait for you to pull them up like you promised. Too many terrible things happen in this world by pure accident. No one needs to create strife intentionally.

So I do that. I take it seriously. What I don't understand is why anyone would not take it seriously. It's an honest question I'll pitch to cyberspace: how is it that when you get close to someone, you can still manage to maintain all of yourself? How can you dehumanize the other half of the relationship to the point where you can walk away like leaving a puppy on a sidewalk? Is it pure selfishness? Is it a trust issue? Because, as it stands to me (and the one other person I encountered today who thinks the same way, and seems to care as much as I do about preserving that thought process), it's just selfishness. It's not being able to understand anything outside yourself, it's seeing the whole world through you-colored glasses. It's believing we live in a vacuum where friendships are experiments testing how much control you have over another human, and in the end your actions will have no lasting affect on the person standing next you.
Pardon my lack of eloquence, but that's disgusting.
What's so awful about it, is some people try to paint this as self-deprecating, thinking they are so "unimportant" that no one pays attention to what they do.
Well if that's not a cop-out, I don't know what is. You are now free of any responsibility for your actions because we are all supposed to pity you to the point of feeling guilty that we care about what you do. Guilty of caring. Guilty of wanting to want you. We now feel small for caring whether or not you call because apparently we're supposed to understand that you don't matter.
And that's just the way you are. Nothing personal, right?
Whoa.
Back up.
I delve into the Meg Ryan romantic comedy canon for my response: "I'm so sick of that. It was personal to me. What's so wrong about being personal? Whatever else anything is, it ought to begin by being personal!"
All anything IS in this world is personal! We are persons after all, aren't we? So any interaction we have will be, by definition, personal. When you leave, when you decide you no longer need my insecurities to inflate your ego, I will take that personally. I will be crushed. You will break my heart. If you stay and treat me like crap, take me for granted, I will take that personally. That will hurt. And there's no excuse in the world, especially "That's just the way I am, nothing personal", will fix that. You've already taken part of me away with all of you.
The worst part about it?
You'll be fine.
Since all that matters in the world is you and you'll always have that, you will never mourn the loss of a person and the part of you they took like I do. So while I might be morally "right" by the overarching values of society, I will still feel worse than you. You're probably conscious of about zero of this, but I will miss you a lot longer than you will miss me. I will think about you years down the line when I direct the show you created, watch a movie with the actor you look just like, or get the song you wrote stuck in my head.
And you will be thinking about what you've always thought about. You.

I've never met anyone quite in the same boat at such the same time as me-but looking at my friend on 22nd street, realizing that this incredible person had just been dropped as fast as hippies dropping acid, was like watching a heart break. Scratch that. I was watching a heart break.
Please. Someone be as outraged as I am that someone can look at their best friend sobbing and not lift a finger to comfort them in any manner, walk away without a scratch. I want to ask those people who walk, if you did that to yourself (since that's the only scenario I can imagine mattering to you) how would you feel? You're lucky you can't escape yourself, or I can't imagine how heartbroken you'd be.

Here's the bottom line: relationships shouldn't be that hard (oh, I can't wait to see how I get jumped all over for that one-stick with me). I don't mean you shouldn't have to work at them, nothing anyone ever has is worth anything if they didn't work for it. I just mean that you should be willing to. The incentive to keep up a very close relationship that has been through a lot should not be something in constant question, because the likelihood of finding someone else willing to be that close to you is so small. Those types of relationships should be the aspects of your life that make everything easier. But I guess for those whose world begins at the top of their heads and ends at the tips of their toes, those relationships are not necessary. They can encapsulate everything they need to survive in that space.
Oh, that I were so blissfully selfish.

I don't believe in god, per se. My belief, in a very small and very generalized nutshell, is that we have each other. Period. If you asked me to point to divine intervention in my life, it's the connections I've made with people. The trust I've found in friends and family (surprisingly and only later in life). That person holding my hand, listening to me complain, emailing me their notes from class. That's all we know we've got. Sure, you can believe in god. You can have faith that rocket-powered golden unicorns run our lives. I'm not downplaying anyone's beliefs here-they're powerful and valid. But this is about definitions, not merit. So what do you know? Or I guess the real question is, who do you know? You know your statistics TA laughs at you when you can't add in your head. You know that you and Ben Kweller both get nosebleeds at very inopportune moments. You know that you and your best friend of almost 21 years can eat two jars of nutella in one weekend with no silverware, thank you very much.
That's it.
And if that's it. The person next to you might as well be the last stop. Trust is religion, is faith, is believing in something bigger than yourself. Your connection with others might as well be god. If you don't re-evaluate this for any other reason, think of it as your last chance, as your heaven.
And next time I see you, next time you see your best friend, know they think of you as theirs.